Oh, the irony. What is THAT doing with the potential Armageddon-machinery in the largest particle experimentation ever? Remember Oppenheimer? Obviously some don't.
I HAVE BECOME DEATH, THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS
tiistai 30. syyskuuta 2008
The Destroyer of Worlds
Oh, the irony. What is THAT doing with the potential Armageddon-machinery in the largest particle experimentation ever? Remember Oppenheimer? Obviously some don't.
I HAVE BECOME DEATH, THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS
To be or not to be: Eugenics
I know this is controversial and most certainly debatable. There are thousands of studies and papers written on this subject but I've come to a conclusion that someone (quite a few people have so far in the alternative media)ought to connect the dots and provide material where one can decide for what to make of it.
So what is eugenics? Wikipedia says it's "a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention," such as: "selective breeding, parental testing, genetic counseling, birth control, in vitro fertilization, and genetic engineering".
Typically there are two sides on the same coin: "Positive eugenics is aimed to encourage reproduction among the genetically advantaged. Possible approaches include financial and political stimuli, targeted demographic analyses, in vitro fertilization, egg transplants, and cloning." and "Negative eugenics is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged. This includes abortions, sterilization, and other methods of family planning."
Depending on the point of view, some might say both the positive and negative factions are positive and some could say they're both negative. The fundamental values of human life are being tested.
Anyways, I can imagine most likely everyone can think of the benefits of eugenics, at least the positive factors of women's rights and so forth..But I intend to concentrate on the negative aspects of the movement. Let's look at some of the big names in the history of eugenics and what they wanted to achieve.
First we have Sir Francis Galton, the father of eugenics, states in his book Hereditary Genius: "I propose to show in this book that a man's natural abilities are derived by inheritance, under exactly the same limitations as are the form and physical features of the whole organic world. Consequently, as it is easy, notwithstanding those limitations, to obtain by careful selection a permanent breed of dogs or horses gifted with peculiar powers of running, or of doing anything else, so it would be quite practicable to produce a highly-gifted race of men by judicious marriages during several consecutive generations." Galton was the cousin of Charles Darwin and many of Galton's conclusion clearly have basis on Darwin's theory of evolution.
More or less, eugenics was supported by prominent people, including H. G. Wells, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, William Keith Kellogg and Margaret Sanger. Eugenics became an academic discipline at many colleges and universities. Funding was provided by prestigious sources such as the Rockefeller Foundation.
After Gaulton, eugenics was supported by Woodrow Wilson, and, in 1907, helped to make Indiana the first of more than thirty states to adopt legislation aimed at compulsory sterilization of certain individuals. Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a Virginia law allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927. These laws were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927 and were not abolished until the mid-20th century. By 1945 over 45,000 mentally ill individuals in the United States had been forcibly sterilized. All in all, 60,000 Americans were sterilized. When Nazi administrators went on trial for war crimes in Nuremberg after World War II, they justified the mass sterilizations (over 450,000 in less than a decade) by citing the United States as their inspiration. Besides the large-scale program in the United States and Nazi Germany, other nations included Australia, Norway, France, Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, and Switzerland with programs to sterilize people the government declared to be mentally deficient.
After that, eugenics went underground. Many pre-war eugenicists engaged in what they later labeled "crypto-eugenics" became respected anthropologists, biologists and geneticists in the postwar world. Julian Huxley, the first Director-General of UNESCO and a founder of the World Wildlife Fund was also a Eugenics Society president and a strong supporter of eugenics.
So far we have some of the biggest names in history, strongly tied in eugenics. UN leaders, heads of state, scientists and some of the richest bankers/CEOs in the world funding eugenics operations disguised as genetic engineering. Some even say that overpopulation will be a threat to national security and must be taken care of via ways of eugenics operations. Here's a quote from Henry Kissinger: "Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries."
and something from Bertrand Russell: "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton." (The Impact of Science on Society (1953) pgs. 49-50)
Let's look at nazis. The nazi eugenics program was to create an Aryan superman with pan-germanic origins, backed by the Thule Society and the Aryan myth by H.P. Blavatsky; founder of the Theosophic Society. The Nazis used a tool, a computer to be exact, to tattoo barcodes on jewish people who were going to the concentration camps. Where did this hi-tech computer come from? IBM:
"In August 1943, a timber merchant from Bendzin, Poland, arrived at Auschwitz. He was among a group of 400 inmates, mostly Jews. First, a doctor examined him briefly to determine his fitness for work. His physical information was noted on a medical record. Second, his full prisoner registration was completed with all personal details. Third, his name was checked against the indices of the Political Section to see if he would be subjected to special punishment. Finally, he was registered in the Labor Assignment Office and assigned a characteristic five-digit IBM Hollerith number, 44673.The five-digit Hollerith number was part of a custom punch card system devised by IBM to track prisoners in Nazi concentration camps, including the slave labor at Auschwitz."
OK. So who funded the nazis? George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush. Who else? General Motors, The Rockefellers.. There's lots and lots of that stuff you can dig yourself.
Anyways, I was reading an article about the Chinese melamine scandal spreading worldwide with milk products and other similiar products as well, when I remembered something I had read some time ago. China's organ harvesting in labor camps with euthanasia trucks: "The condemned are led to waiting trucks. A rope is secured around the throats of these prisoners to cut off any last minute statements as they are ferried a short distance to the execution fields. Crowds await, as schools and businesses have closed for the occasion. Attendance is mandatory." Could that be eugenics?
What about pharmaceuticals? One can easily find articles like: AIDS drugs tested on foster children, EPA rule loopholes allow pesticide testing on kids or Two Out of Three Foster Children in Texas on Psychotropic Medication & Bayer sells HIV contaminated hemophilia vaccines, on purpose. Corporate greed or eugenics? Does anyone else see a pattern here? Take a look at CIA black ops, like MK-Ultra or the Iran-Contra scandal where CIA was caught shipping heroin and cocaine into US out of South-America. Check out who made deals with IG Farben(the compay that produced Zyklon-B) back in the 1930s.
What about food? Kissinger states in NSSM 200 (linked earlier) that food will be used as weapon. GMO is another thing that some count as eugenics. I'm planning to make a different post only on Monsanto, but until that you can do some research on your own. A good place to start is google video and a documentary there called "The World according to Monsanto".
Lots of stuff. Highly debatable and very controversial. I could've mentioned chemtrails, IMF&World Bank loans, strategic aid, military experiments and a whole bunch of other things, but I am going to leave the ball on your court. Do your research and make up your mind because it just might be that someone, in some ivory tower, does not want the best for you or your children.
So what is eugenics? Wikipedia says it's "a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention," such as: "selective breeding, parental testing, genetic counseling, birth control, in vitro fertilization, and genetic engineering".
Typically there are two sides on the same coin: "Positive eugenics is aimed to encourage reproduction among the genetically advantaged. Possible approaches include financial and political stimuli, targeted demographic analyses, in vitro fertilization, egg transplants, and cloning." and "Negative eugenics is aimed at lowering fertility among the genetically disadvantaged. This includes abortions, sterilization, and other methods of family planning."
Depending on the point of view, some might say both the positive and negative factions are positive and some could say they're both negative. The fundamental values of human life are being tested.
Anyways, I can imagine most likely everyone can think of the benefits of eugenics, at least the positive factors of women's rights and so forth..But I intend to concentrate on the negative aspects of the movement. Let's look at some of the big names in the history of eugenics and what they wanted to achieve.
First we have Sir Francis Galton, the father of eugenics, states in his book Hereditary Genius: "I propose to show in this book that a man's natural abilities are derived by inheritance, under exactly the same limitations as are the form and physical features of the whole organic world. Consequently, as it is easy, notwithstanding those limitations, to obtain by careful selection a permanent breed of dogs or horses gifted with peculiar powers of running, or of doing anything else, so it would be quite practicable to produce a highly-gifted race of men by judicious marriages during several consecutive generations." Galton was the cousin of Charles Darwin and many of Galton's conclusion clearly have basis on Darwin's theory of evolution.
More or less, eugenics was supported by prominent people, including H. G. Wells, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, William Keith Kellogg and Margaret Sanger. Eugenics became an academic discipline at many colleges and universities. Funding was provided by prestigious sources such as the Rockefeller Foundation.
After Gaulton, eugenics was supported by Woodrow Wilson, and, in 1907, helped to make Indiana the first of more than thirty states to adopt legislation aimed at compulsory sterilization of certain individuals. Although the law was overturned by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1921, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a Virginia law allowing for the compulsory sterilization of patients of state mental institutions in 1927. These laws were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927 and were not abolished until the mid-20th century. By 1945 over 45,000 mentally ill individuals in the United States had been forcibly sterilized. All in all, 60,000 Americans were sterilized. When Nazi administrators went on trial for war crimes in Nuremberg after World War II, they justified the mass sterilizations (over 450,000 in less than a decade) by citing the United States as their inspiration. Besides the large-scale program in the United States and Nazi Germany, other nations included Australia, Norway, France, Finland, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, and Switzerland with programs to sterilize people the government declared to be mentally deficient.
After that, eugenics went underground. Many pre-war eugenicists engaged in what they later labeled "crypto-eugenics" became respected anthropologists, biologists and geneticists in the postwar world. Julian Huxley, the first Director-General of UNESCO and a founder of the World Wildlife Fund was also a Eugenics Society president and a strong supporter of eugenics.
So far we have some of the biggest names in history, strongly tied in eugenics. UN leaders, heads of state, scientists and some of the richest bankers/CEOs in the world funding eugenics operations disguised as genetic engineering. Some even say that overpopulation will be a threat to national security and must be taken care of via ways of eugenics operations. Here's a quote from Henry Kissinger: "Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries."
and something from Bertrand Russell: "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton." (The Impact of Science on Society (1953) pgs. 49-50)
Let's look at nazis. The nazi eugenics program was to create an Aryan superman with pan-germanic origins, backed by the Thule Society and the Aryan myth by H.P. Blavatsky; founder of the Theosophic Society. The Nazis used a tool, a computer to be exact, to tattoo barcodes on jewish people who were going to the concentration camps. Where did this hi-tech computer come from? IBM:
"In August 1943, a timber merchant from Bendzin, Poland, arrived at Auschwitz. He was among a group of 400 inmates, mostly Jews. First, a doctor examined him briefly to determine his fitness for work. His physical information was noted on a medical record. Second, his full prisoner registration was completed with all personal details. Third, his name was checked against the indices of the Political Section to see if he would be subjected to special punishment. Finally, he was registered in the Labor Assignment Office and assigned a characteristic five-digit IBM Hollerith number, 44673.The five-digit Hollerith number was part of a custom punch card system devised by IBM to track prisoners in Nazi concentration camps, including the slave labor at Auschwitz."
OK. So who funded the nazis? George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush. Who else? General Motors, The Rockefellers.. There's lots and lots of that stuff you can dig yourself.
Anyways, I was reading an article about the Chinese melamine scandal spreading worldwide with milk products and other similiar products as well, when I remembered something I had read some time ago. China's organ harvesting in labor camps with euthanasia trucks: "The condemned are led to waiting trucks. A rope is secured around the throats of these prisoners to cut off any last minute statements as they are ferried a short distance to the execution fields. Crowds await, as schools and businesses have closed for the occasion. Attendance is mandatory." Could that be eugenics?
What about pharmaceuticals? One can easily find articles like: AIDS drugs tested on foster children, EPA rule loopholes allow pesticide testing on kids or Two Out of Three Foster Children in Texas on Psychotropic Medication & Bayer sells HIV contaminated hemophilia vaccines, on purpose. Corporate greed or eugenics? Does anyone else see a pattern here? Take a look at CIA black ops, like MK-Ultra or the Iran-Contra scandal where CIA was caught shipping heroin and cocaine into US out of South-America. Check out who made deals with IG Farben(the compay that produced Zyklon-B) back in the 1930s.
What about food? Kissinger states in NSSM 200 (linked earlier) that food will be used as weapon. GMO is another thing that some count as eugenics. I'm planning to make a different post only on Monsanto, but until that you can do some research on your own. A good place to start is google video and a documentary there called "The World according to Monsanto".
Lots of stuff. Highly debatable and very controversial. I could've mentioned chemtrails, IMF&World Bank loans, strategic aid, military experiments and a whole bunch of other things, but I am going to leave the ball on your court. Do your research and make up your mind because it just might be that someone, in some ivory tower, does not want the best for you or your children.
maanantai 29. syyskuuta 2008
Who's gonna bail you out, tonight?
The Big Bang, the bailout bill (cool name for a superhero) is to be voted today. Evolving from 3 pages to over 100 it no longer seems like a blank cheque but still continues to raise doubts. Iranian website released some of the details of the bill. After we examine the bill, I think it is important to examine the parallels of post-9/11 acts, such as the Patriot Act, and the troubles in the economy clearly created by the dirty, greedy hands of the Wall Street executives.
"The fundamental proposal remains unchanged. $700 billion will be made available to the Treasury Secretary to purchase bad debts from ailing banks. Talks over the past week have added the following provisions.
- The Treasury will be able to access $250 billion immediately and ask the White House for a further $100 billion. Congress then has veto power over future payments up to a total of $700 billion.
- Banks that are bailed out by the fund will have to give the taxpayer equity in return, which could see the public benefit if the bank recovers.
- At participating banks “golden parachutes,” i.e. big handouts to top bankers who lose their jobs will be banned. Limits will be put on CEO bonuses, and bonuses paid on expected gains that turn out to be false will have to be given back.
- Four agencies will monitor the deal including a bipartisan oversight board and an independent Inspector General. There will also be a judicial review of the Treasury Secretary's actions.
- The government will have the power to renegotiate mortgage terms to ease pressure on homeowners facing foreclosure.
"
...
Nice. But wait, not one of those new fundamental changes still talk about the derivatives! Anyone with an intelligence of 10-year-old can easily look at the trade deals and the faults in the legistlative premises when money can be printed out of thin air into speculation and sharing the risks, while spreading the debt (that's all money is, was, and continues to be under the system operating under the big central banks) overseas. It's killing the dollar!
How is it so hard to see, for the decision makers and executives on the Capitol Hill, the when the US dollar implodes, it sinks the whole wide world with it? Let's take a closer look, shall we. The US dollar is backed by bananas. Hence, oil markets and speculation is backed by bananas. The oil itself is a great buy, but the system behind the trade is going to be worthless. Several middle-eastern currencies are backed by the dollar. Who in the world is going to bail out the dollar based system when it's facing a cataclysmic turmoil by the bailout bill itself when the only thing that's done is creating more money out of thin air? Liquidity is only going to make the bubble a bit bigger, not saving the global economic order.
Now, let's look who has the biggest pile of chips in derivatives. According to government memo and the pdf from the website, a certain picture comes right in your face. Yeah... 90 trillion USD exposure for JP Morgan. Do the math, check who gets backed by FED in foreclosures and mergers. Unbeliveable.
By far I think we can all agree what the real bailout bill stands for:
- Concentration of wealth to certain pockets on certain companies on certain street, by the expence of the tax payers, most likely, globally.
- Blackmailing citizens to pay taxes (somewhat indirectly) in the future, for useless things like the Garbage fines in the UK, for 5000 £ I might add.
- Bigger government
- Socialized markets
- Huge spendings
- More lies
Sounds familiar? Yeah, it should. It came out, that the malicious piece of legistlation called the Patriot Act, was written years before 9/11, as was the Bailout-Bill(BB); months ago. 9/11 seems to be an inside job, BB seems to be insiders trading with each other. Post-9/11 world continues to suffer from the war on terror -paradigm, pre-BB world already shows signs of blaming the average Joe for not handling his/her credit and living beyond means. The Patriot Act wipes out several civil liberties, the BB wipes out ways and means to endure in a situation where one can benefit from civil liberties in various forms of trade. The list goes on and on.
Far fetched? Only time will tell. So far the signs seem to be quite gloomy for the average homeowner on the global Main Street. For all the skeptics out there: just in case something might happend, get storable food, clean water supplies and something concrete instead of paper money.
"The fundamental proposal remains unchanged. $700 billion will be made available to the Treasury Secretary to purchase bad debts from ailing banks. Talks over the past week have added the following provisions.
- The Treasury will be able to access $250 billion immediately and ask the White House for a further $100 billion. Congress then has veto power over future payments up to a total of $700 billion.
- Banks that are bailed out by the fund will have to give the taxpayer equity in return, which could see the public benefit if the bank recovers.
- At participating banks “golden parachutes,” i.e. big handouts to top bankers who lose their jobs will be banned. Limits will be put on CEO bonuses, and bonuses paid on expected gains that turn out to be false will have to be given back.
- Four agencies will monitor the deal including a bipartisan oversight board and an independent Inspector General. There will also be a judicial review of the Treasury Secretary's actions.
- The government will have the power to renegotiate mortgage terms to ease pressure on homeowners facing foreclosure.
"
...
Nice. But wait, not one of those new fundamental changes still talk about the derivatives! Anyone with an intelligence of 10-year-old can easily look at the trade deals and the faults in the legistlative premises when money can be printed out of thin air into speculation and sharing the risks, while spreading the debt (that's all money is, was, and continues to be under the system operating under the big central banks) overseas. It's killing the dollar!
How is it so hard to see, for the decision makers and executives on the Capitol Hill, the when the US dollar implodes, it sinks the whole wide world with it? Let's take a closer look, shall we. The US dollar is backed by bananas. Hence, oil markets and speculation is backed by bananas. The oil itself is a great buy, but the system behind the trade is going to be worthless. Several middle-eastern currencies are backed by the dollar. Who in the world is going to bail out the dollar based system when it's facing a cataclysmic turmoil by the bailout bill itself when the only thing that's done is creating more money out of thin air? Liquidity is only going to make the bubble a bit bigger, not saving the global economic order.
Now, let's look who has the biggest pile of chips in derivatives. According to government memo and the pdf from the website, a certain picture comes right in your face. Yeah... 90 trillion USD exposure for JP Morgan. Do the math, check who gets backed by FED in foreclosures and mergers. Unbeliveable.
By far I think we can all agree what the real bailout bill stands for:
- Concentration of wealth to certain pockets on certain companies on certain street, by the expence of the tax payers, most likely, globally.
- Blackmailing citizens to pay taxes (somewhat indirectly) in the future, for useless things like the Garbage fines in the UK, for 5000 £ I might add.
- Bigger government
- Socialized markets
- Huge spendings
- More lies
Sounds familiar? Yeah, it should. It came out, that the malicious piece of legistlation called the Patriot Act, was written years before 9/11, as was the Bailout-Bill(BB); months ago. 9/11 seems to be an inside job, BB seems to be insiders trading with each other. Post-9/11 world continues to suffer from the war on terror -paradigm, pre-BB world already shows signs of blaming the average Joe for not handling his/her credit and living beyond means. The Patriot Act wipes out several civil liberties, the BB wipes out ways and means to endure in a situation where one can benefit from civil liberties in various forms of trade. The list goes on and on.
Far fetched? Only time will tell. So far the signs seem to be quite gloomy for the average homeowner on the global Main Street. For all the skeptics out there: just in case something might happend, get storable food, clean water supplies and something concrete instead of paper money.
sunnuntai 28. syyskuuta 2008
Resurrection & False-flag op's
Hey folks,
I decided to reopen my blog here. I deleted all the old posts for personal reasons. I also decided to reform the old concept into less personal issues. I have all the old posts stored somewhere so if you want, I am more than willing to email them to you. Here goes...
Sometime in mid-June, I started to take a closer look about what's going on in Pakistan. As I'm sure you already know, US made a nuke deal with India. At first it seemed to be somewhat odd, but when taking a closer look, it started to make sense. I believe the main reason for that deal was Pakistan and the "war on terror" in Afghanistan. Pakistani officials and the ISI (CIA-proxy) made a deal with US official fighting the Taliban and Al-Qaida inside Pakistan, along the border of Afghanistan; where, according to mainline publications from the Central Idiotic Agency, mr. Bin Laden is allegedly hiding.
As time went by, Finnish media began to release pieces of news about acts of terror inside Pakistan. The US and the rest of the western anti-terror allies gave their support and sympathy for Pakistani people and vowed to capture the enemies of the free world (namely Taliban guerillas and militias).
In the beginning of September US drones and helicopters started to fly from the Afghan side of the border to Pakistan and bomb the living daylights out of Taliban fighters and some civilians.
After resignition of President Musharraf, the new president Asif Ali Zardari, spoke against the post-colonialistic imperialism of the Bush adminstration and demanded US to stop insulting the sovereignty of Pakistan. Some two hours after the speech Marriott Hotel in Islamabad was blown to pieces. Immediately I looked up what Daily.pk had to say about the incident. I came across some serious shit, I'm about to share with you. Something that's picked from the website in question:
"1. Why a US embassy truckload of steel boxes was unloaded and shifted inside the Marriott Hotel on the same night when Admiral Mike Mullen met Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and others in Islamabad? (two nights before this devastating explosion)
2. Why both the main gates (the entrance and the exit) of the hotel were closed while no one except the US Marines were either allowed to go near the truck or get the steel boxes unloaded or shift them inside the hotel.
3. Why these steel boxes were not passed through the scanners installed at the entrance of the hotel lobby and were reportedly shifted to the 4th and 5th floors of the Marriott? (Pakistani PM Gillani was even asked to go through the security checks on US airport, even removing his shoes in the recent visit to US.)
4. Why the truck loaded with explosives T&T, RDX and explosives hit the barrier outside the Marriot Hotel where as the fire was seen on exactly the 4th and 5th floor with unusual intensity and flame color that could not be extinguished and later burned entire of the Hotel.
...
6. Why the suicide truck hit the barrier on the left side of the building entrance/gate but the fir broke out on the top floor (5th floor) on the right side and exactly above the lobby?
7. Why US Marines were seen entering the Hotel building AFTER THE EXPLOSION HIDING THEIR FACES (captured on AAJ TV footage) soon after the explosion? They were supposed to be inside the hotel right? What were they doing outside that too in uniform, if they had booked the rooms in 4th and 5th floor they should have been in there? And why such top US marines had checked in a public hotel a few days back and why they had to shift such confidential material in steel boxes in a public place?
8. Why all of a sudden sources had to say the GAS PIPE line inside the hotel caught fire? When the incident had just taken place? Was this pre decided that GAS PIPE will catch fire and there could be nothing else? Why it was stated in such a rush before an inquiry had taken place?
...
10. Why the US Marines had to risk their lives and go inside the hotel building when they were not from rescue teams or Pakistan security forces? Was there something to hide or cover? Was their something to check because the plan had not executed to perfection (the truck exploded outside where as it was planned to explode in front of the reception) or they never wanted the Rescue forces to get some clue (unexploded material on 4th or 5th floor)?
11. Why the fire further detoriated after the US Marines went in the hotel building?
12. How come the fire increased to such an extent that it encapsulated the entire building raising the inside temperature to 400 Degrees?
3. Why the US ambassador in Islamabad first announced that there were absolutely no US personnel in Marriott Hotel and no one was residing there but later had to change her statement that MAY BE there were some US marines inside the hotel (THIS STATEMENT CAME AFTER THE MEDIA, AAJ TV FOOTAGE CAUGHT US MARINES GOING IN THE HOTEL)
14. Why US embassy had to hide and lie in first place that there were no US related people inside the Hotel.
15. WHY PENTAGON CONFIRMED THE DEATH OF 2 US Marines on the next day but denied to disclose the names or show the bodies of them?
16. Why the CDA water tankers and fire extinguishers, could not start their water pumps because of uncharged batteries to extinguish the fire on 4th and 5th floor?
17. Why the batteries of fire extinguishers of CDA vehicles were not charged even though the Presidential address was to be held right on the same day in the same vicinity? And when Chief of Army staff, PM, Chief Minister, Governors were at one place and security and emergency services were at RED ALERT why the fire extinguishers had uncharged batteries? Is that casual attitude, inadequate facility or a deliberate plan?
18. Why Now there's US National Security Advisor (and one of the few warmongering ultra neocons that is still in the Bush administration), Stephen Hadley, trying to tell the Pakistanis that they need the US to go into Pakistan to get these 'terrorists' because Pakistan hasn't got the wherewithal to do it themselves?
19. Laslty, why was MR. BUSH the first person to convey his condolences to Pakistan and offer assistance of FBI in carrying out investigations?"
...
Some serious delirium, folks! Looks like the neo-cons are getting desperate. If Obama gets elected (backed by Brezhinski) the powerchord and the missile systems inside the former Soviet states inside EU are being pointed on Mother Russia. On the other hand, if the melanomatic Grand Ol' Man (backed by Kissinger & co.) is annointed, the Sarecens will find themselves in the middle of a vitriolic winter. Unbeliveable.
Oh yeah, almost forgot. Martial Law: official kick off date Oct 1st. Sit back and enjoy the ride. Over and out..
I decided to reopen my blog here. I deleted all the old posts for personal reasons. I also decided to reform the old concept into less personal issues. I have all the old posts stored somewhere so if you want, I am more than willing to email them to you. Here goes...
Sometime in mid-June, I started to take a closer look about what's going on in Pakistan. As I'm sure you already know, US made a nuke deal with India. At first it seemed to be somewhat odd, but when taking a closer look, it started to make sense. I believe the main reason for that deal was Pakistan and the "war on terror" in Afghanistan. Pakistani officials and the ISI (CIA-proxy) made a deal with US official fighting the Taliban and Al-Qaida inside Pakistan, along the border of Afghanistan; where, according to mainline publications from the Central Idiotic Agency, mr. Bin Laden is allegedly hiding.
As time went by, Finnish media began to release pieces of news about acts of terror inside Pakistan. The US and the rest of the western anti-terror allies gave their support and sympathy for Pakistani people and vowed to capture the enemies of the free world (namely Taliban guerillas and militias).
In the beginning of September US drones and helicopters started to fly from the Afghan side of the border to Pakistan and bomb the living daylights out of Taliban fighters and some civilians.
After resignition of President Musharraf, the new president Asif Ali Zardari, spoke against the post-colonialistic imperialism of the Bush adminstration and demanded US to stop insulting the sovereignty of Pakistan. Some two hours after the speech Marriott Hotel in Islamabad was blown to pieces. Immediately I looked up what Daily.pk had to say about the incident. I came across some serious shit, I'm about to share with you. Something that's picked from the website in question:
"1. Why a US embassy truckload of steel boxes was unloaded and shifted inside the Marriott Hotel on the same night when Admiral Mike Mullen met Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and others in Islamabad? (two nights before this devastating explosion)
2. Why both the main gates (the entrance and the exit) of the hotel were closed while no one except the US Marines were either allowed to go near the truck or get the steel boxes unloaded or shift them inside the hotel.
3. Why these steel boxes were not passed through the scanners installed at the entrance of the hotel lobby and were reportedly shifted to the 4th and 5th floors of the Marriott? (Pakistani PM Gillani was even asked to go through the security checks on US airport, even removing his shoes in the recent visit to US.)
4. Why the truck loaded with explosives T&T, RDX and explosives hit the barrier outside the Marriot Hotel where as the fire was seen on exactly the 4th and 5th floor with unusual intensity and flame color that could not be extinguished and later burned entire of the Hotel.
...
6. Why the suicide truck hit the barrier on the left side of the building entrance/gate but the fir broke out on the top floor (5th floor) on the right side and exactly above the lobby?
7. Why US Marines were seen entering the Hotel building AFTER THE EXPLOSION HIDING THEIR FACES (captured on AAJ TV footage) soon after the explosion? They were supposed to be inside the hotel right? What were they doing outside that too in uniform, if they had booked the rooms in 4th and 5th floor they should have been in there? And why such top US marines had checked in a public hotel a few days back and why they had to shift such confidential material in steel boxes in a public place?
8. Why all of a sudden sources had to say the GAS PIPE line inside the hotel caught fire? When the incident had just taken place? Was this pre decided that GAS PIPE will catch fire and there could be nothing else? Why it was stated in such a rush before an inquiry had taken place?
...
10. Why the US Marines had to risk their lives and go inside the hotel building when they were not from rescue teams or Pakistan security forces? Was there something to hide or cover? Was their something to check because the plan had not executed to perfection (the truck exploded outside where as it was planned to explode in front of the reception) or they never wanted the Rescue forces to get some clue (unexploded material on 4th or 5th floor)?
11. Why the fire further detoriated after the US Marines went in the hotel building?
12. How come the fire increased to such an extent that it encapsulated the entire building raising the inside temperature to 400 Degrees?
3. Why the US ambassador in Islamabad first announced that there were absolutely no US personnel in Marriott Hotel and no one was residing there but later had to change her statement that MAY BE there were some US marines inside the hotel (THIS STATEMENT CAME AFTER THE MEDIA, AAJ TV FOOTAGE CAUGHT US MARINES GOING IN THE HOTEL)
14. Why US embassy had to hide and lie in first place that there were no US related people inside the Hotel.
15. WHY PENTAGON CONFIRMED THE DEATH OF 2 US Marines on the next day but denied to disclose the names or show the bodies of them?
16. Why the CDA water tankers and fire extinguishers, could not start their water pumps because of uncharged batteries to extinguish the fire on 4th and 5th floor?
17. Why the batteries of fire extinguishers of CDA vehicles were not charged even though the Presidential address was to be held right on the same day in the same vicinity? And when Chief of Army staff, PM, Chief Minister, Governors were at one place and security and emergency services were at RED ALERT why the fire extinguishers had uncharged batteries? Is that casual attitude, inadequate facility or a deliberate plan?
18. Why Now there's US National Security Advisor (and one of the few warmongering ultra neocons that is still in the Bush administration), Stephen Hadley, trying to tell the Pakistanis that they need the US to go into Pakistan to get these 'terrorists' because Pakistan hasn't got the wherewithal to do it themselves?
19. Laslty, why was MR. BUSH the first person to convey his condolences to Pakistan and offer assistance of FBI in carrying out investigations?"
...
Some serious delirium, folks! Looks like the neo-cons are getting desperate. If Obama gets elected (backed by Brezhinski) the powerchord and the missile systems inside the former Soviet states inside EU are being pointed on Mother Russia. On the other hand, if the melanomatic Grand Ol' Man (backed by Kissinger & co.) is annointed, the Sarecens will find themselves in the middle of a vitriolic winter. Unbeliveable.
Oh yeah, almost forgot. Martial Law: official kick off date Oct 1st. Sit back and enjoy the ride. Over and out..
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)
