Another article from Prisonplanet. I don't know what to say. I'll just post it here:
According to reports out of top Chinese mainstream news outlets, the RAND Corporation recently presented a shocking proposal to the Pentagon in which it lobbied for a war to be started with a major foreign power in an attempt to stimulate the American economy and prevent a recession.
A fierce debate has now ensued in China about who that foreign power may be, with China itself as well as Russia and even Japan suspected to be the targets of aggression.
The reports cite French media news sources as having uncovered the proposal, in which RAND suggested that the $700 billion dollars that has been earmarked to bailout Wall Street and failing banks instead be used to finance a new war which would in turn re-invigorate the flagging stock markets.
The RAND Corporation is a notoriously powerful NGO with deep ties to the U.S. military-industrial complex as well as interlocking connections with the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations.
Current directors of RAND include Frank Charles Carlucci III, former Defense Secretary and Deputy Director of the CIA, Ronald L. Olson, Council on Foreign Relations luminary and former Secretary of Labor, and Carl Bildt, top Bilderberg member and former Swedish Prime Minister.
Carlucci was chairman of the Carlyle Group from 1989-2005 and oversaw gargantuan profits the defense contractor made in the aftermath of 9/11 following the invasion of Afghanistan. The Carlyle Group has also received investment money from the Bin Laden family.
Reportedly, the RAND proposal brazenly urged that a new war could be launched to benefit the economy, but stressed that the target country would have to be a major influential power, and not a smaller country on the scale of Afghanistan or Iraq.
The reports have prompted a surge of public debate and tension in China about the possibility that a new global conflict is on the horizon.
China’s biggest media outlet, Sohu.com, speculated that the target of the new war would probably be China or Russia, but that it could also be Iran or another middle eastern country. Japan was also mentioned as a potential target for the reason that Japan holds the most U.S. debt.
North Korea was considered as a target but ruled out because the scale of such a war would not be large enough for RAND’s requirements.
The reported RAND proposal dovetails with recent comments made by Joe Biden, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright and others, concerning the “guarantee” that Barack Obama will face a major “international crisis” soon after taking office.
Translations from Chinese provided by Yihan Dai.
***
Take a real close look at that. A real damn close look!! Please, prepare yourselves.
torstai 30. lokakuuta 2008
The Brzezinski Code
I found an article from The Sun where British PM Gordon Brown (Bilderberg, etc.) warned that "THE world’s bank — the International Monetary Fund — is going BUST and must be bailed out."
I'll post the whole article here:
The IMF has only got £150billion left, it emerged — with dozens of countries queuing up for major handouts to keep afloat.
The PM urged cash-rich China and oil sheikhs to give hundreds of billions so the IMF can keep giving out funds — and stop it going bust.
Mr Brown said: “This may not be enough. It is becoming increasingly clear to me we cannot delay and we now need substantial additional resources in addition to the $250billion the IMF already has available.
“The big surplus countries — those that have got big reserves — are in a position to help most and we will be urging them to do so.”
The IMF’s role is to help countries stave off bankruptcy. It handed over £16.5billion to Ukraine this week and Hungary is also desperate for funds.
Dozens of others — especially in eastern Europe — will need big bailouts because of the global slump.
World leaders fear a Russian takeover move unless they are able to survive. China is cash-rich, having spent ten years banking profits in a special fund rather than investing them abroad.
Oil-rich countries in the Gulf are also able to plough funds into the IMF. The UK supplies five per cent of IMF cash, compared with China’s 3.7 per cent.
Last night Mr Brown held talks in Paris with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who backed the PM in urging the reshaping of the IMF.
Mr Sarkozy said: “We will work hand in glove to get out of this terrible crisis.”
Mr Brown said: “Our first priority is to stop the contagion to other countries, including in eastern Europe, where there are problems emerging and action must be taken.”
...
Okay, so this is about Russia after all? The same thing happened with Iceland, when IMF rushed to save it before Russia could buy it over. This is total Brzezinski. Russia has become the old-new enemy. It has begun.
I'll post the whole article here:
The IMF has only got £150billion left, it emerged — with dozens of countries queuing up for major handouts to keep afloat.
The PM urged cash-rich China and oil sheikhs to give hundreds of billions so the IMF can keep giving out funds — and stop it going bust.
Mr Brown said: “This may not be enough. It is becoming increasingly clear to me we cannot delay and we now need substantial additional resources in addition to the $250billion the IMF already has available.
“The big surplus countries — those that have got big reserves — are in a position to help most and we will be urging them to do so.”
The IMF’s role is to help countries stave off bankruptcy. It handed over £16.5billion to Ukraine this week and Hungary is also desperate for funds.
Dozens of others — especially in eastern Europe — will need big bailouts because of the global slump.
World leaders fear a Russian takeover move unless they are able to survive. China is cash-rich, having spent ten years banking profits in a special fund rather than investing them abroad.
Oil-rich countries in the Gulf are also able to plough funds into the IMF. The UK supplies five per cent of IMF cash, compared with China’s 3.7 per cent.
Last night Mr Brown held talks in Paris with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who backed the PM in urging the reshaping of the IMF.
Mr Sarkozy said: “We will work hand in glove to get out of this terrible crisis.”
Mr Brown said: “Our first priority is to stop the contagion to other countries, including in eastern Europe, where there are problems emerging and action must be taken.”
...
Okay, so this is about Russia after all? The same thing happened with Iceland, when IMF rushed to save it before Russia could buy it over. This is total Brzezinski. Russia has become the old-new enemy. It has begun.
keskiviikko 29. lokakuuta 2008
Back from the Future
Counterpoint: How I Learned to Love the New World Order
Biden, Joseph R Jr. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
A13
Imagine my surprise when a Wall Street Journal editorial appointed me dean of the Pat Buchanan school of neo-isolationism. My credentials? Believing that the Pentagon's new strategy -- America as "Globocop" -- could render the United States a hollow superpower. All agree we need the military capacity to defend our vital interests -- by ourselves when need be. The question is grand strategy. With the Journal's endorsement, the Pentagon has called for a Pax Americana: The U.S. should cast so large a military shadow that no rival dare emerge.
American hegemony might be a pleasant idea, but is it economically, politically or even militarily wise? Bristling with weapons, we would continue our economic decline, while rising industrial and financial giants in Europe and Asia viewed our military pretensions with indifference or contempt.
Defense Secretary Dick Cheney outdid even the Journal, dipping deep into the well of Cold War argumentation to accuse Pax Americana critics of thinking "America's world presence is somehow immoral and dangerous.
" Why doesn't the Journal stop the namecalling, get its schools sorted out, and court an honest debate over America's proper role in the new world order?
Pat Buchanan's "America First" preaches martyrdom: We've been suckered into fighting "other" people's battles and defending "other" people's interests. With our dismal economy, this siren song holds some appeal.
But most Americans, myself included, reject 1930s-style isolationism. They expect to see the strong hand of American leadership in world affairs, and they know that economic retreat would yield nothing other than a lower standard of living. They understand further that many security threats -- the spread of high-tech weapons, environmental degradation, overpopulation, narcotics trafficking, migration -- require global solutions.
What about America as globocop? First, our 21st-century strategy has to be a shade more clever than Mao's axiom that power comes from the barrel of a gun. Power also emanates from a solid bank balance, the ability to dominate and penetrate markets, and the economic leverage to wield diplomatic clout.
Second, the plan is passive where it needs to be aggressive. The Journal endorses a global security system in which we destroy rogue-state threats as they arise. Fine, but let's prevent such problems early rather than curing them late. Having contained Soviet communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of "containment" -- based, like NATO, on collective action, but directed against weapons proliferation.
The reality is that we can slow proliferation to a snail's pace if we stop irresponsible technology transfers. Fortunately, nearly all suppliers are finally showing restraint. The maverick is China, which persists in hawking sensitive weapons and technology to the likes of Syria, Iran, Libya, Algeria and Pakistan -- even while pledging otherwise.
The Senate has tried to force China's leaders to choose between Third World arms sales (1991 profits of $500 million) and open trade with the U.S. (a $12.5 billion annual Chinese surplus). Even though we have convincing intelligence that China's leaders fear the use of this leverage, the president inexplicably refuses to challenge Beijing.
Weapons containment can't be foolproof; and against a nuclear-armed North Korea, I would support pre-emptive military action if necessary. But let's do our best -- using supplier restraint and sanctions against outlaw sellers and buyers-to avoid having to round up the posse.
Why not an anti-proliferation "czar" in the cabinet to give this objective the prominence it urgently needs?
Third, Pax Americana is a direct slap at two of our closest allies -- Japan and Germany -- and a repudiation of one of our panel1. Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? great postwar triumphs. For years, American leaders argued that building democracy in Europe and Asia would guarantee stability because democracies don't start wars. Now the Pentagon says we must keep our military large enough to persuade Japan and Germany "not to aspire to a greater role even to protect their legitimate interests.
"
How has our success suddenly become a threat? It hasn't, but the Pentagon plan could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By insulting Tokyo and Berlin, and arrogating to ourselves military stewardship of the world, we may spark the revival no one wants.
Secretary Cheney says he wants the allies to share the burden on defense matters. But Pax Americana puts us on the wrong end of a paradox: Hegemony means that even our allies can force ever greater U.S.
defense spending the more they try to share the burden!
Fourth, collective security doesn't rule out unilateral action. The Journal says I'm among those who want "Americans . . . to trust their security to a global committee." But no one advocates that we repeal the "inherent" right of self-defense enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Secretary Cheney says his plan wouldn't undermine support for the U.N. Who would know better than the U.N.'s usually understated secretary general? If implemented, says Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the Pentagon's strategy would spell "the end of the U.N." Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? It envisages a permanent commitment of forces, for use by the Security Council. That means a presumption of collective action -- but with a U.S. veto.
Rather than defending military extravagance, the Bush administration should be reallocating Pentagon funds to meet more urgent security needs: sustaining democracy in the former Soviet empire; supporting U.N. peacekeepers in Yugoslavia, Cambodia and El Salvador; and rebuilding a weakened and debt-burdened America.
If Pentagon strategists and their kneejerk supporters could broaden their horizons, they would see how our superpower status is best assured. We must get lean militarily, revitalize American economic strength, and exercise a diplomatic leadership that puts new muscle into institutions of collective security.
....
The vice presidential candidate, in the early 90s. Yyyyyyyyep, can't make this stuff up.
Biden, Joseph R Jr. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Apr 23, 1992. pg.
A13
Imagine my surprise when a Wall Street Journal editorial appointed me dean of the Pat Buchanan school of neo-isolationism. My credentials? Believing that the Pentagon's new strategy -- America as "Globocop" -- could render the United States a hollow superpower. All agree we need the military capacity to defend our vital interests -- by ourselves when need be. The question is grand strategy. With the Journal's endorsement, the Pentagon has called for a Pax Americana: The U.S. should cast so large a military shadow that no rival dare emerge.
American hegemony might be a pleasant idea, but is it economically, politically or even militarily wise? Bristling with weapons, we would continue our economic decline, while rising industrial and financial giants in Europe and Asia viewed our military pretensions with indifference or contempt.
Defense Secretary Dick Cheney outdid even the Journal, dipping deep into the well of Cold War argumentation to accuse Pax Americana critics of thinking "America's world presence is somehow immoral and dangerous.
" Why doesn't the Journal stop the namecalling, get its schools sorted out, and court an honest debate over America's proper role in the new world order?
Pat Buchanan's "America First" preaches martyrdom: We've been suckered into fighting "other" people's battles and defending "other" people's interests. With our dismal economy, this siren song holds some appeal.
But most Americans, myself included, reject 1930s-style isolationism. They expect to see the strong hand of American leadership in world affairs, and they know that economic retreat would yield nothing other than a lower standard of living. They understand further that many security threats -- the spread of high-tech weapons, environmental degradation, overpopulation, narcotics trafficking, migration -- require global solutions.
What about America as globocop? First, our 21st-century strategy has to be a shade more clever than Mao's axiom that power comes from the barrel of a gun. Power also emanates from a solid bank balance, the ability to dominate and penetrate markets, and the economic leverage to wield diplomatic clout.
Second, the plan is passive where it needs to be aggressive. The Journal endorses a global security system in which we destroy rogue-state threats as they arise. Fine, but let's prevent such problems early rather than curing them late. Having contained Soviet communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of "containment" -- based, like NATO, on collective action, but directed against weapons proliferation.
The reality is that we can slow proliferation to a snail's pace if we stop irresponsible technology transfers. Fortunately, nearly all suppliers are finally showing restraint. The maverick is China, which persists in hawking sensitive weapons and technology to the likes of Syria, Iran, Libya, Algeria and Pakistan -- even while pledging otherwise.
The Senate has tried to force China's leaders to choose between Third World arms sales (1991 profits of $500 million) and open trade with the U.S. (a $12.5 billion annual Chinese surplus). Even though we have convincing intelligence that China's leaders fear the use of this leverage, the president inexplicably refuses to challenge Beijing.
Weapons containment can't be foolproof; and against a nuclear-armed North Korea, I would support pre-emptive military action if necessary. But let's do our best -- using supplier restraint and sanctions against outlaw sellers and buyers-to avoid having to round up the posse.
Why not an anti-proliferation "czar" in the cabinet to give this objective the prominence it urgently needs?
Third, Pax Americana is a direct slap at two of our closest allies -- Japan and Germany -- and a repudiation of one of our panel1. Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? great postwar triumphs. For years, American leaders argued that building democracy in Europe and Asia would guarantee stability because democracies don't start wars. Now the Pentagon says we must keep our military large enough to persuade Japan and Germany "not to aspire to a greater role even to protect their legitimate interests.
"
How has our success suddenly become a threat? It hasn't, but the Pentagon plan could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By insulting Tokyo and Berlin, and arrogating to ourselves military stewardship of the world, we may spark the revival no one wants.
Secretary Cheney says he wants the allies to share the burden on defense matters. But Pax Americana puts us on the wrong end of a paradox: Hegemony means that even our allies can force ever greater U.S.
defense spending the more they try to share the burden!
Fourth, collective security doesn't rule out unilateral action. The Journal says I'm among those who want "Americans . . . to trust their security to a global committee." But no one advocates that we repeal the "inherent" right of self-defense enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Secretary Cheney says his plan wouldn't undermine support for the U.N. Who would know better than the U.N.'s usually understated secretary general? If implemented, says Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the Pentagon's strategy would spell "the end of the U.N." Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? It envisages a permanent commitment of forces, for use by the Security Council. That means a presumption of collective action -- but with a U.S. veto.
Rather than defending military extravagance, the Bush administration should be reallocating Pentagon funds to meet more urgent security needs: sustaining democracy in the former Soviet empire; supporting U.N. peacekeepers in Yugoslavia, Cambodia and El Salvador; and rebuilding a weakened and debt-burdened America.
If Pentagon strategists and their kneejerk supporters could broaden their horizons, they would see how our superpower status is best assured. We must get lean militarily, revitalize American economic strength, and exercise a diplomatic leadership that puts new muscle into institutions of collective security.
....
The vice presidential candidate, in the early 90s. Yyyyyyyyep, can't make this stuff up.
The Grand Chessboard
Just a few days until the US presidential election, some members of the GOP have used some very interesting terms in their speeches. For example, Joe Biden said that Obama would be tested during the first six months of his presidency. One Colin Powell stressed that something cataclysmic would be upon the US in late January or early February. Now, this to me seems that the Project for the New American Century has come to an end.
It is most likely that Obama will be the next president and the leader of the free world. I've critisized him earlier about the Mussolini-connections and some obscurities with the Kenyan birth certificate stuff and all that, so I'll be focusing on the future and the people he's associated with outside the mainstream media. What first comes to mind, is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brz was National Security Adviser for the Carter adminstration back in the late 70s and early 80s. The atrocities made then are still kept in the dark, even today. Little is known in the common history books of his connections replacing the Iranian leader with the help of the Henry Kissinger (Shah,1979). Also the Cambodian bombigs, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and criticism of the Clinton adm. with the Serbia situation were under his supervision, along with the members of the Trilateral Comission (founded by him and David Rockefeller).
So the, what I believe to be, fake criticism of the neo-con agenda doesn't really have anything to do with the current government but the neo-con think-tank paper PNAC and the concept of the war on terror. Now, one of the architects of the PNAC document was Paul Wolfowitz, a former head of the World Bank [sic!], as well as a former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense. Now, I really don't want get into the contents of the PNAC document, but the 100-year plan involves Israel back in the middle-east strategy, of course. And when it comes to the state of Israel, Brzez hasn't really been a fan of it's policies. It is a well-known fact that he has defended the paper The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, denounced AIPAC and had some really angry speeches at the HQ of Council of Foreign Relations. One of the key notes on his book, published in '97, was the polarisation of the western anglo-american empire with Russia and China, by means of divide & conquer. Anyone who has studied Balcanization of the late Roman military history, knows what this is about. At latest, it's about the Georgia-conflict, dividence of Pakistan over islamistic tribes and Kashmir-situation with India. It's about Kosovo and early Yugoslavia. It's about centralazing power with expence of proxy states and allegorical archetypes, meaning mainly Russia-China pact.
What's funny with the guy, is that he openly denounces the socialistic agenda and supports the Orange revolution (actually funded through Auchi) as well as the Rose revolution in Georgia, all socialistic adminstrations by nature, yet in the reach of western imperialism. Enough of that, find about yourself.
Then there's the Chicago mafia scene, namely Nadhmi Auchi, who has connections throughout the world, including Iraqi arms trade and drug trade. This is from Wikileaks:
"Auchi has been shown to be the fountainhead of a source of corruption flowing from Iraq, to France, Italy, and the United States. His financial network, under a Luxembourg company called General Mediterranean Holdings, spread from Baghdad and the Middle East to Paris, (where Auchi successfully posited Saddam's UN Oil for Food scheme), London, Washington, and Chicago, making very few ripples and raising no concerns."
And:
"Auchi has claimed to have been "a visitor to two White Houses", and his London web site flashes a picture of him at the Clinton White House between Bill Clinton and Al Gore (a long way from his early days with Saddam Hussein as part of a Baathist assassination squad.) Auchi is, however, also the shadowy puppet master to Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a Syrian American with whom he partnered for more than a decade in schemes from Baghdad all the way to Chicago. Their relationship began in the wake of the Iran-Iraq War, when the US was cultivating Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Rezko is now in federal prison awaiting sentencing for 16 counts of corruption involving Illinois officials. Buying influence is his métier, guided and financed by his master, Auchi. Rezko has also been a White House visitor, with his picture taken with Bill and Hillary Clinton for his contributions out of Chicago to the Clinton political war chest."
There's tons of stuff about Obama and ACORN, Obama denouncing Israel (mainly because of the Brzezinski influence), Obama youth brigades, Obama truth squads and then there's the propaganda for change for the lemmings and kool-aid drinkers: change and yes we can. Now I can assure you, there's gonna be a change. There will be a change with McCain too, but as the agenda behind the puppets remains the same, McCain, if elected, will be facing a gridlock with the democrating congress and senate.. as well as the hatred towards Bush and Cheney with the whole republican party. Then again, if Obama gets elected, he's gonna change the world for carbon tax, for the hungry African children, for the Main Street, for the Trade Unions, for the polar bears and so on. See what I'm saying?
So beware of the false messiah, the seducing spirit and the puppet of the masters. Anyways, anything is possible and I'll be the first one to accept the misinterpretations I've made. But still, it's not the votes that count. It's who counts the votes. The puppets change, the masters don't.
It is most likely that Obama will be the next president and the leader of the free world. I've critisized him earlier about the Mussolini-connections and some obscurities with the Kenyan birth certificate stuff and all that, so I'll be focusing on the future and the people he's associated with outside the mainstream media. What first comes to mind, is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brz was National Security Adviser for the Carter adminstration back in the late 70s and early 80s. The atrocities made then are still kept in the dark, even today. Little is known in the common history books of his connections replacing the Iranian leader with the help of the Henry Kissinger (Shah,1979). Also the Cambodian bombigs, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and criticism of the Clinton adm. with the Serbia situation were under his supervision, along with the members of the Trilateral Comission (founded by him and David Rockefeller).
So the, what I believe to be, fake criticism of the neo-con agenda doesn't really have anything to do with the current government but the neo-con think-tank paper PNAC and the concept of the war on terror. Now, one of the architects of the PNAC document was Paul Wolfowitz, a former head of the World Bank [sic!], as well as a former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense. Now, I really don't want get into the contents of the PNAC document, but the 100-year plan involves Israel back in the middle-east strategy, of course. And when it comes to the state of Israel, Brzez hasn't really been a fan of it's policies. It is a well-known fact that he has defended the paper The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, denounced AIPAC and had some really angry speeches at the HQ of Council of Foreign Relations. One of the key notes on his book, published in '97, was the polarisation of the western anglo-american empire with Russia and China, by means of divide & conquer. Anyone who has studied Balcanization of the late Roman military history, knows what this is about. At latest, it's about the Georgia-conflict, dividence of Pakistan over islamistic tribes and Kashmir-situation with India. It's about Kosovo and early Yugoslavia. It's about centralazing power with expence of proxy states and allegorical archetypes, meaning mainly Russia-China pact.
What's funny with the guy, is that he openly denounces the socialistic agenda and supports the Orange revolution (actually funded through Auchi) as well as the Rose revolution in Georgia, all socialistic adminstrations by nature, yet in the reach of western imperialism. Enough of that, find about yourself.
Then there's the Chicago mafia scene, namely Nadhmi Auchi, who has connections throughout the world, including Iraqi arms trade and drug trade. This is from Wikileaks:
"Auchi has been shown to be the fountainhead of a source of corruption flowing from Iraq, to France, Italy, and the United States. His financial network, under a Luxembourg company called General Mediterranean Holdings, spread from Baghdad and the Middle East to Paris, (where Auchi successfully posited Saddam's UN Oil for Food scheme), London, Washington, and Chicago, making very few ripples and raising no concerns."
And:
"Auchi has claimed to have been "a visitor to two White Houses", and his London web site flashes a picture of him at the Clinton White House between Bill Clinton and Al Gore (a long way from his early days with Saddam Hussein as part of a Baathist assassination squad.) Auchi is, however, also the shadowy puppet master to Antoin "Tony" Rezko, a Syrian American with whom he partnered for more than a decade in schemes from Baghdad all the way to Chicago. Their relationship began in the wake of the Iran-Iraq War, when the US was cultivating Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Rezko is now in federal prison awaiting sentencing for 16 counts of corruption involving Illinois officials. Buying influence is his métier, guided and financed by his master, Auchi. Rezko has also been a White House visitor, with his picture taken with Bill and Hillary Clinton for his contributions out of Chicago to the Clinton political war chest."
There's tons of stuff about Obama and ACORN, Obama denouncing Israel (mainly because of the Brzezinski influence), Obama youth brigades, Obama truth squads and then there's the propaganda for change for the lemmings and kool-aid drinkers: change and yes we can. Now I can assure you, there's gonna be a change. There will be a change with McCain too, but as the agenda behind the puppets remains the same, McCain, if elected, will be facing a gridlock with the democrating congress and senate.. as well as the hatred towards Bush and Cheney with the whole republican party. Then again, if Obama gets elected, he's gonna change the world for carbon tax, for the hungry African children, for the Main Street, for the Trade Unions, for the polar bears and so on. See what I'm saying?
So beware of the false messiah, the seducing spirit and the puppet of the masters. Anyways, anything is possible and I'll be the first one to accept the misinterpretations I've made. But still, it's not the votes that count. It's who counts the votes. The puppets change, the masters don't.
keskiviikko 22. lokakuuta 2008
"Re-inventing" economics
Reuters goes on spreading the CoR propaganda released back in the early 90s. Some quotes from the article:
"The worst financial crisis since the 1930s may be a chance to put price tags on nature in a radical economic rethink to protect everything from coral reefs to rainforests, environmental experts say."
"Advocates of "eco-nomics" say that valuing "natural capital" could help protect nature from rising human populations, pollution and climate change that do not figure in conventional measures of wealth such as gross domestic product (GDP) or gross national product (GNP)."
"'I believe the 21st century will be dominated by the concept of natural capital, just as the 20th was dominated by financial capital,' Achim Steiner, head of the U.N. Environment Program, told Reuters at the International Union for Conservation of Nature congress in Barcelona earlier this month."
"And in U.N. talks on a new climate treaty, more than 190 nations are considering a plan to pay tropical nations billions of dollars a year to leave forests alone to slow deforestation and combat global warming."
***
Not all bad, I agree. But it is kinda scary when you think of where the ideas are coming from. I challenge you to study the history of UN and the Theosophic society along with the crypto-eugenics movement.
"The worst financial crisis since the 1930s may be a chance to put price tags on nature in a radical economic rethink to protect everything from coral reefs to rainforests, environmental experts say."
"Advocates of "eco-nomics" say that valuing "natural capital" could help protect nature from rising human populations, pollution and climate change that do not figure in conventional measures of wealth such as gross domestic product (GDP) or gross national product (GNP)."
"'I believe the 21st century will be dominated by the concept of natural capital, just as the 20th was dominated by financial capital,' Achim Steiner, head of the U.N. Environment Program, told Reuters at the International Union for Conservation of Nature congress in Barcelona earlier this month."
"And in U.N. talks on a new climate treaty, more than 190 nations are considering a plan to pay tropical nations billions of dollars a year to leave forests alone to slow deforestation and combat global warming."
***
Not all bad, I agree. But it is kinda scary when you think of where the ideas are coming from. I challenge you to study the history of UN and the Theosophic society along with the crypto-eugenics movement.
tiistai 21. lokakuuta 2008
1984
I found an article posted on Infowars that'll be sharing with you. It's too important not to be mentioned here. Here goes:
Global security authorities are to push for a huge biometric facial scan database of international travelers so they can cross-check everyone against a database of terror suspects, international criminals and fugitives.
Two months ago we reported on the moves underway to phase out passport control officers at airports and replace them with biometric face scanning cameras. The automated face recognition gates match passengers to a digital image stored on a microchip in the new e-passports.
Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, is planning to expand its role into the mass screening of passengers moving around the world by creating a face recognition database to catch wanted suspects, reports the London Guardian.
The database will hold the records of every citizen who has ever traveled in and out of the virtually every country in the world, representing intelligence agency style bulk interception of information and sounding alarm bells for civil liberties groups.
Two months ago we reported on the moves underway to phase out passport control officers at airports and replace them with biometric face scanning cameras. The automated face recognition gates match passengers to a digital image stored on a microchip in the new e-passports.
Interpol wants a facial database to be linked into this technology and used in conjunction with its already existing fingerprint and DNA databases, according to Mark Branchflower, head of Interpol’s fingerprint unit.
We have previously noted that the vast array of databases currently being employed by intelligence agencies, government and law enforcement agencies worldwide were designed to be linked together in a system which will tie in the management and control of all facets of life for citizens to one central hub.
Earlier this year we reported on the announcement of a vast intelligence program to establish a global biometric database known as “Server in the Sky” that will collate and provide an ” International Information Consortium” with access to the biometric measurements and personal information of citizens across the globe in the name of fighting the “war on terror”.
As reported by the London Guardian, the plan is being formulated by the FBI with the cooperation of the home offices and law enforcement agencies of American allies. The technology is being supplied by the US defense company Northrop Grumman.
Furthermore, the use of such technology, as we have already seen, will not be limited to the passport control office.
A 2007 British government report muted an extensive upgrade to cctv systems all across the country to incorporate facial scanning technology. The report suggested a central database of every camera and a network allowing access to it could be beneficial.
In the US there are several schemes that use Facial Recognition Technology in conjunction with Federal agencies, tying the technology to traditional documents such as drivers licenses, passports and credit cards.
A biometric face recognition system has already been approved in China and is expected to be used at airports, customs entrances, banks, post offices, residential areas and other public places in the near future.
Other proposals include placing the cameras in every seat on aircraft and installing software to try and automatically detect terrorists or other dangers caused by passengers.
We are assured that cigarette vending machines will employ the technology in order to enforce smoking laws. Similarly, supermarkets in the UK have already started trialing the technology with the justification being a crackdown on underage drinking.
In Japan facial scanning cameras are being installed in train and bus stations to replace tickets in a move to make the individual features of the face a “unique bar code” as part of an antiterrorism and anticrime initiative.
Police in Tokyo are also asking home and shop owners to mount the cameras outside their properties. “Police investigating an incident in the neighborhood would have access to these images.” according to reports.
Cell phones and computers are now also being produced with face scanning cameras.
***
Check out the links on the original article posted on Infowars.com
Use Google to find similiar stuff all around the world. The control grid goes ad infinitum.
EDIT: I found this on Daily Mail:
"Adolf Hitler was on the verge of creating an Orwellian-style cable TV system to broadcast Nazi propaganda around Germany.
Screens would have been set up in public places, including in laundries so housewives could tune in, according to a documentary based on papers and tapes found in his bunker.
When the Allies overran Germany, engineers were on the point of a technological breakthrough to allow TV pictures to be transmitted to screens and sound to radio receivers.
They had also recorded programmes on news, sport and education.
Prototype programmes included Family Chronicles: An Evening With Hans And Gelli, an early reality TV show depicting the wholesome Aryan life of a young German couple for the rest of the population to model themselves on.
Another plan was to show footage of executions of traitors to the Nazis.
The plans first came to light in 1945, when boxes with tapes were found in the ruins of Berlin by Soviet soldiers, the Russian documentary says.
According to the programme, the engineer Walter Bruch was asked to make 'people's television' a reality.
He tabled a document to Hitler called 'Plan to supply people's transmitter to German homes,' and the laying of a broadband cable between Berlin and Nuremberg was begun, it claimed.
A former SS officer, Curt Schulmeitser, told the programme how a relative of Hitler's mistress Eva Braun was filmed being shot after being caught trying to flee Berlin as the Soviet army advanced.
Schulmeitser said Hitler's deputy Heinrich Himmler authorised the filming and hinted it was being filmed for Hitler to watch.
He said: 'Himmler wanted somebody else in a different place to see what was going on.'
Josef Hebbels, who masterminded the plan, told Rudolph Hess's sister Margaret, who was also working on the scheme: 'We'll be able to show whatever we want. We'll create a reality, which the people of Germany need and can copy. Your task is to teach German women to live this way'.
Hitler early on realised the power of television propaganda. His address at the opening ceremony of the Berlin Olympic Games in 1936 was broadcast to system of bulky mobile TV stations where Germans could watch in town squares.
But the programme claims the Nazi leader and his scientists were planning a far more complex series of public TV screens before the allies overran Germany and he committed suicide in 1945.
The scheme is reminiscent of George Orwell's novel 1984, where Big Brother looms out from public screens entreating the subdued populace to work for the state and telling them 'Big Brother is watching you'.
The reality television show, Big Brother, in which contestants are under constant surveillance, is based on Orwell's concept."
***
Incredible. This is staggering.. It's beyond belief! You can't make this stuff up.
Global security authorities are to push for a huge biometric facial scan database of international travelers so they can cross-check everyone against a database of terror suspects, international criminals and fugitives.
Two months ago we reported on the moves underway to phase out passport control officers at airports and replace them with biometric face scanning cameras. The automated face recognition gates match passengers to a digital image stored on a microchip in the new e-passports.
Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, is planning to expand its role into the mass screening of passengers moving around the world by creating a face recognition database to catch wanted suspects, reports the London Guardian.
The database will hold the records of every citizen who has ever traveled in and out of the virtually every country in the world, representing intelligence agency style bulk interception of information and sounding alarm bells for civil liberties groups.
Two months ago we reported on the moves underway to phase out passport control officers at airports and replace them with biometric face scanning cameras. The automated face recognition gates match passengers to a digital image stored on a microchip in the new e-passports.
Interpol wants a facial database to be linked into this technology and used in conjunction with its already existing fingerprint and DNA databases, according to Mark Branchflower, head of Interpol’s fingerprint unit.
We have previously noted that the vast array of databases currently being employed by intelligence agencies, government and law enforcement agencies worldwide were designed to be linked together in a system which will tie in the management and control of all facets of life for citizens to one central hub.
Earlier this year we reported on the announcement of a vast intelligence program to establish a global biometric database known as “Server in the Sky” that will collate and provide an ” International Information Consortium” with access to the biometric measurements and personal information of citizens across the globe in the name of fighting the “war on terror”.
As reported by the London Guardian, the plan is being formulated by the FBI with the cooperation of the home offices and law enforcement agencies of American allies. The technology is being supplied by the US defense company Northrop Grumman.
Furthermore, the use of such technology, as we have already seen, will not be limited to the passport control office.
A 2007 British government report muted an extensive upgrade to cctv systems all across the country to incorporate facial scanning technology. The report suggested a central database of every camera and a network allowing access to it could be beneficial.
In the US there are several schemes that use Facial Recognition Technology in conjunction with Federal agencies, tying the technology to traditional documents such as drivers licenses, passports and credit cards.
A biometric face recognition system has already been approved in China and is expected to be used at airports, customs entrances, banks, post offices, residential areas and other public places in the near future.
Other proposals include placing the cameras in every seat on aircraft and installing software to try and automatically detect terrorists or other dangers caused by passengers.
We are assured that cigarette vending machines will employ the technology in order to enforce smoking laws. Similarly, supermarkets in the UK have already started trialing the technology with the justification being a crackdown on underage drinking.
In Japan facial scanning cameras are being installed in train and bus stations to replace tickets in a move to make the individual features of the face a “unique bar code” as part of an antiterrorism and anticrime initiative.
Police in Tokyo are also asking home and shop owners to mount the cameras outside their properties. “Police investigating an incident in the neighborhood would have access to these images.” according to reports.
Cell phones and computers are now also being produced with face scanning cameras.
***
Check out the links on the original article posted on Infowars.com
Use Google to find similiar stuff all around the world. The control grid goes ad infinitum.
EDIT: I found this on Daily Mail:
"Adolf Hitler was on the verge of creating an Orwellian-style cable TV system to broadcast Nazi propaganda around Germany.
Screens would have been set up in public places, including in laundries so housewives could tune in, according to a documentary based on papers and tapes found in his bunker.
When the Allies overran Germany, engineers were on the point of a technological breakthrough to allow TV pictures to be transmitted to screens and sound to radio receivers.
They had also recorded programmes on news, sport and education.
Prototype programmes included Family Chronicles: An Evening With Hans And Gelli, an early reality TV show depicting the wholesome Aryan life of a young German couple for the rest of the population to model themselves on.
Another plan was to show footage of executions of traitors to the Nazis.
The plans first came to light in 1945, when boxes with tapes were found in the ruins of Berlin by Soviet soldiers, the Russian documentary says.
According to the programme, the engineer Walter Bruch was asked to make 'people's television' a reality.
He tabled a document to Hitler called 'Plan to supply people's transmitter to German homes,' and the laying of a broadband cable between Berlin and Nuremberg was begun, it claimed.
A former SS officer, Curt Schulmeitser, told the programme how a relative of Hitler's mistress Eva Braun was filmed being shot after being caught trying to flee Berlin as the Soviet army advanced.
Schulmeitser said Hitler's deputy Heinrich Himmler authorised the filming and hinted it was being filmed for Hitler to watch.
He said: 'Himmler wanted somebody else in a different place to see what was going on.'
Josef Hebbels, who masterminded the plan, told Rudolph Hess's sister Margaret, who was also working on the scheme: 'We'll be able to show whatever we want. We'll create a reality, which the people of Germany need and can copy. Your task is to teach German women to live this way'.
Hitler early on realised the power of television propaganda. His address at the opening ceremony of the Berlin Olympic Games in 1936 was broadcast to system of bulky mobile TV stations where Germans could watch in town squares.
But the programme claims the Nazi leader and his scientists were planning a far more complex series of public TV screens before the allies overran Germany and he committed suicide in 1945.
The scheme is reminiscent of George Orwell's novel 1984, where Big Brother looms out from public screens entreating the subdued populace to work for the state and telling them 'Big Brother is watching you'.
The reality television show, Big Brother, in which contestants are under constant surveillance, is based on Orwell's concept."
***
Incredible. This is staggering.. It's beyond belief! You can't make this stuff up.
maanantai 20. lokakuuta 2008
I feel lazy
Zump. A trilateral global currency and the dollar coming down. Didn't see that one coming... Google G8 summits before the year 2000 and you'll find similiar stuff mentioned back then. By the way, Google's a useful tool, just to remind you.
Zrofffff... Nope, didn't really think of that either. Bunch of conspiracy theories. Diana a Rothschild, go figure.
Nevermind all that, let's all watch Big Brother 24/7.
Zrofffff... Nope, didn't really think of that either. Bunch of conspiracy theories. Diana a Rothschild, go figure.
Nevermind all that, let's all watch Big Brother 24/7.
lauantai 18. lokakuuta 2008
Homework time II
You know, I've come to a conclusion that there's something wrong with our world. We live in a world where thousands of people die due to several preventable diseases, in a world where there's war for natural resources, in a world where education means basically indoctrination (by the way, have you thought that some might actually gain profit because of the fact that you're stupid and don't know anything about any thing?) , in a world where there's only a handful of political parties to vote for (and bought and paid for) and thousands of flavors for crispy doughnuts. In a world where evil runs amok and somewhat all the great reformers such as Gandhi, Kennedy and Jesus are assasinated (by the state). How do you live with yourselves? How do you get up in the morning thinking of the weather and how it possibly affects the decision you make when thinking of taking a bus or a bike to work?
What's the point of knowing anything about any conspiracy or the like when you don't do anything about it? We think about it for a moment, feel bad and then turn on the TV and start to watch a program about near-extinct monkeys in some jungle on the other side of the world. What good is it to study environmental engineering when know you that the stuff you may come up with isn't gonna help anyone because the big industry's not gonna allow to come out if it threatens their share of sales? What good is it to study majors in economics when you know that the game is rigged anyways? What good is it to work when all the products you're able to purchase are manifactured in unethical conditions in Nicaragua at the cost of the very lives of the poor farmers and miners in China or India? What's the point?
How come we're here still exhaling because supposedly carbon dioxide is a toxic waste for the environment, and what by-the-way plants breathe in order to live and create oxygen? How come we're not suicidal nihilists waiting all this to crumble down like a house of cards on judgement day. Well, some of as are, but some are taking action. It hurts to know. It's rather easy to be oblivious and not care. However, herein lies a dilemma: what makes us tick? What's that tiny little voice inside of each and everyone of us that says: HELP! I FEEL LIKE SHIT AND SOMETHING'S NOT RIGHT! I'll let that sink for awhile.
Think about it. What's in it for us in the case of humanitarian aid or social welfare. If humans are corrupt and sinful since the very first breath of birth, what's that thing that produces goodness, mercy, love and compassion? Is it the human spirit and instinct to take care of your loved ones on an extended global scale? Since most of us don't give a shit, I think that's probably not the case. I personally believe, it's a higher power. Now I want you to think for a moment that are we, as a species, corrupt, doomed to fail experiment of nature. Or are we a creation of a supreme being that's all-wise and expresses the prototypes of enlightment, love and wisdom through creation of a destructive and fairly ignorant creature. I have no evidence against either ones of those arguments and I think that we won't ever really find that out for sure. Religion, such as science and atheism is a form of a faith-based mindset that doesn't really, in a fundamental level, have anything to do with logic and reason.
Maybe we're out here for cleansing or some type of purification or maybe we're here to merely die and express the seemingly random triumph of Nature's puns and cycles. However, since we are here for any one of those reasons added to ones you may come up with, we could just make something good out of it, while we're still here.
What's the point of knowing anything about any conspiracy or the like when you don't do anything about it? We think about it for a moment, feel bad and then turn on the TV and start to watch a program about near-extinct monkeys in some jungle on the other side of the world. What good is it to study environmental engineering when know you that the stuff you may come up with isn't gonna help anyone because the big industry's not gonna allow to come out if it threatens their share of sales? What good is it to study majors in economics when you know that the game is rigged anyways? What good is it to work when all the products you're able to purchase are manifactured in unethical conditions in Nicaragua at the cost of the very lives of the poor farmers and miners in China or India? What's the point?
How come we're here still exhaling because supposedly carbon dioxide is a toxic waste for the environment, and what by-the-way plants breathe in order to live and create oxygen? How come we're not suicidal nihilists waiting all this to crumble down like a house of cards on judgement day. Well, some of as are, but some are taking action. It hurts to know. It's rather easy to be oblivious and not care. However, herein lies a dilemma: what makes us tick? What's that tiny little voice inside of each and everyone of us that says: HELP! I FEEL LIKE SHIT AND SOMETHING'S NOT RIGHT! I'll let that sink for awhile.
Think about it. What's in it for us in the case of humanitarian aid or social welfare. If humans are corrupt and sinful since the very first breath of birth, what's that thing that produces goodness, mercy, love and compassion? Is it the human spirit and instinct to take care of your loved ones on an extended global scale? Since most of us don't give a shit, I think that's probably not the case. I personally believe, it's a higher power. Now I want you to think for a moment that are we, as a species, corrupt, doomed to fail experiment of nature. Or are we a creation of a supreme being that's all-wise and expresses the prototypes of enlightment, love and wisdom through creation of a destructive and fairly ignorant creature. I have no evidence against either ones of those arguments and I think that we won't ever really find that out for sure. Religion, such as science and atheism is a form of a faith-based mindset that doesn't really, in a fundamental level, have anything to do with logic and reason.
Maybe we're out here for cleansing or some type of purification or maybe we're here to merely die and express the seemingly random triumph of Nature's puns and cycles. However, since we are here for any one of those reasons added to ones you may come up with, we could just make something good out of it, while we're still here.
maanantai 13. lokakuuta 2008
Homework time
Sources? Documents? Publications? Read, circulate, educate, promote:
1949 - C M Eichelberg - World Government via the United Nations
1947 - N Rockefeller - The Inter-American System and the UN
1946 - J. Houxley - UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy "In its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.."
1949 - UNESCO - Toward World Understanding V
1991 - CoR - First Global Revolution
1981 - Caroll Quigley - The Anglo-American Establishment
1972 - Dialogue Kissinger with Rockefeller
1973 - TC [R01] - Towards a Renovated World Monetary System
2000 - UN - United Nations Millennium Declaration
2005 05 - CFR, NAFTA, NAU - Building a North American Community
1975 - TC - The Crisis of Democracy
The Commission on Global Governance (CGG)
1997 - Bush's New World Order: The Meaning Behind the Words (1997)
1962 03 13 - Operation Northwood
1997 - Zbigniew Brzezinski - The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperative
1949 - The Papers of the Royal Commission on Population
1970 - Zbigniew Brzezinski - Between Two Ages
1932 - Margaret Sanger - A Plan for Peace
1798 - Abbe Barruel - History of Jacobism VOL 1
2001 - Foreign Affairs - Toward Global Parliament - Richard Falk
National Security Study Memorandum 200
Deliberate dumbing down of America
Hush! Go read 'em!
1949 - C M Eichelberg - World Government via the United Nations
1947 - N Rockefeller - The Inter-American System and the UN
1946 - J. Houxley - UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy "In its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.."
1949 - UNESCO - Toward World Understanding V
1991 - CoR - First Global Revolution
1981 - Caroll Quigley - The Anglo-American Establishment
1972 - Dialogue Kissinger with Rockefeller
1973 - TC [R01] - Towards a Renovated World Monetary System
2000 - UN - United Nations Millennium Declaration
2005 05 - CFR, NAFTA, NAU - Building a North American Community
1975 - TC - The Crisis of Democracy
The Commission on Global Governance (CGG)
1997 - Bush's New World Order: The Meaning Behind the Words (1997)
1962 03 13 - Operation Northwood
1997 - Zbigniew Brzezinski - The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperative
1949 - The Papers of the Royal Commission on Population
1970 - Zbigniew Brzezinski - Between Two Ages
1932 - Margaret Sanger - A Plan for Peace
1798 - Abbe Barruel - History of Jacobism VOL 1
2001 - Foreign Affairs - Toward Global Parliament - Richard Falk
National Security Study Memorandum 200
Deliberate dumbing down of America
Hush! Go read 'em!
perjantai 10. lokakuuta 2008
Ranting and Speculation
I've been posting news and articles and most of them are about US, Pakistan an global monetary issues. Why you might ask? Why nothing about EU or Finland or perhaps Georgia? Well, I have two reasons.
1) We are all connected. Whether you like or not, it's a global village we're living in. Because of the acts of globalists and big corporations, the world has become a playground for the wealthy elite to do what ever they want to... And it's effecting all of us. By connected I don't mean in a hippie-new-age-crap-way but as humans, as a species. Creatures that dwell the planet, and seemingly rule it.
2) I believe America (and UK) are a pretext for what's going to happen globally. Corporations and global organs have expanded their power inside the American government and are doind the most horrible things concerning civil liberties, human rights and moral deeds. I believe America is the frontpage for a global Endgame. I'd also like to add that the guys in suits that run Finland have no spine and do whatever the Elite wants them to do.
I'm sick and tired of people complaining that there's nothing we can do or they don't have any time do anything. We'll, maybe it's time to wake up and get organized. First of all, stop watching TV. There are other ways to obtain information outside of the corrupt media grip. There's not one good reason to watch TV. Not one. You can get all of the entertainment for the web or reading books.
Secondly, read books. Read books about real history. Read books about the history of the monetary system, the history of Rome, the history of Christianity, mystery Babylon, The Bible..Anything you can get your hands on. We. Do. Not. Have. Time. To. Sit. Down. And. Watch. Pointless. Shit. On. TV... We. Do. Not. Have. The. Resources. To. Wear. This. Planet. Out. By. Buying. Useless. Shit. We. Don't. Need!
We do not have the time. You need to email politicians, check out who attended Bilderberg, Bohemian Grove, The Trilateral Comission, The CFR. You need to vote for honest, well-informed people on the election days. Municipal elections, national elections, EU-elections. We MUST even try to stop this. And remember, not everything is made out of flesh. We're against powers and principalities.
I believe there will be a time when we're going to have a global goverment, a global currency, one world army, one world religion (and it ain't gonna be christianity although it might seem like it) and a corrupt elite running it all. I strongly believe we're going to have a microchipped population, because cash won't exist and all transactions will be electric.
Educate yourselves. Educate your family, friends and fellow members of the human race. But most importantly, get your house in order. I really really really hope I'm wrong on this one, but it seems to me that we're sitting on a very thin layer or ice and it's about to melt away. Here's something for a treat and amusement when at last the corporate media gets something right:
1) We are all connected. Whether you like or not, it's a global village we're living in. Because of the acts of globalists and big corporations, the world has become a playground for the wealthy elite to do what ever they want to... And it's effecting all of us. By connected I don't mean in a hippie-new-age-crap-way but as humans, as a species. Creatures that dwell the planet, and seemingly rule it.
2) I believe America (and UK) are a pretext for what's going to happen globally. Corporations and global organs have expanded their power inside the American government and are doind the most horrible things concerning civil liberties, human rights and moral deeds. I believe America is the frontpage for a global Endgame. I'd also like to add that the guys in suits that run Finland have no spine and do whatever the Elite wants them to do.
I'm sick and tired of people complaining that there's nothing we can do or they don't have any time do anything. We'll, maybe it's time to wake up and get organized. First of all, stop watching TV. There are other ways to obtain information outside of the corrupt media grip. There's not one good reason to watch TV. Not one. You can get all of the entertainment for the web or reading books.
Secondly, read books. Read books about real history. Read books about the history of the monetary system, the history of Rome, the history of Christianity, mystery Babylon, The Bible..Anything you can get your hands on. We. Do. Not. Have. Time. To. Sit. Down. And. Watch. Pointless. Shit. On. TV... We. Do. Not. Have. The. Resources. To. Wear. This. Planet. Out. By. Buying. Useless. Shit. We. Don't. Need!
We do not have the time. You need to email politicians, check out who attended Bilderberg, Bohemian Grove, The Trilateral Comission, The CFR. You need to vote for honest, well-informed people on the election days. Municipal elections, national elections, EU-elections. We MUST even try to stop this. And remember, not everything is made out of flesh. We're against powers and principalities.
I believe there will be a time when we're going to have a global goverment, a global currency, one world army, one world religion (and it ain't gonna be christianity although it might seem like it) and a corrupt elite running it all. I strongly believe we're going to have a microchipped population, because cash won't exist and all transactions will be electric.
Educate yourselves. Educate your family, friends and fellow members of the human race. But most importantly, get your house in order. I really really really hope I'm wrong on this one, but it seems to me that we're sitting on a very thin layer or ice and it's about to melt away. Here's something for a treat and amusement when at last the corporate media gets something right:
tiistai 7. lokakuuta 2008
Iran attack delayed...for Obama?
Here's something from PressTV:
"According to a Monday report on Israel's Channel 10, unnamed Israeli sources said the presence of US troops in Iraq spoils chances of an Israeli strike on Iran, arguing that any military action would leave US forces stationed in Iraq vulnerable to Tehran's retaliation.
Tel Aviv has threatened to launch air strikes against Iranian nuclear installations under the pretext that Tehran, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), has plans to develop nuclear weaponry.
This is while, in its latest report on Iran, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced that it could not find any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
In response to war threats, Iran has warned that it would not hesitate to target 'Israel and 32 US bases' in the region, should the country come under attack.
An Israeli official accompanying Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on a visit to Moscow, however, declined to comment on the Channel 10 report. According to a senior Israeli official, Olmert is in Russia to persuade the country into not selling S-300 missile defense system to Iran.
Late in September, The Guardian quoted EU diplomatic sources as saying that US president George W. Bush in a one to one meeting with Israeli Premier Ehud Olmert on May 14 rejected the idea of an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Bush not only ruled out the idea but insisted that his view would not change, according to The Guardian.
The Monday report comes as several Israeli military and Mossad officials, in an unexpected move on Sunday, endorsed the Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Democrat Barack Obama has vowed direct talks with Iranian leaders over its nuclear activities. The Arizona Senator has also declared that he would remove US combat troops within 16 months of taking office in January, 2009.
However, Republican John McCain, a staunch supporter of the Iraq war, has refused to provide a timetable and has said that troops could remain in Iraq for 'a hundred years.'
Former Gaza Sector Commander, Brig.-Gen. Shaul Arieli said, "Obama is the right man for the job [of stopping Iran]."
The former Mossad agent, Alpher, said Republican candidate John McCain would continue the failed policies of the current US President.
"Four more years of indecisiveness would harm Israel," added former chief of the Army Central Command, Amram Mitzna."
...
I don't know if there's really going to be an election, but I'm afraid that if Obama wins, he'll be the new Manchurian candidate. Here's something from WND:
"Kenya – The government of Kenya is holding WND senior staff reporter Jerome Corsi incommunicado at the airport until he departs the country after police shut down a scheduled news conference in which he planned to announce the findings of his investigation into Barack Obama's connections in the country."
...
Obama-youth? Arrested for 'telling lies' about Obama?
Blackshirts, anyone?
"According to a Monday report on Israel's Channel 10, unnamed Israeli sources said the presence of US troops in Iraq spoils chances of an Israeli strike on Iran, arguing that any military action would leave US forces stationed in Iraq vulnerable to Tehran's retaliation.
Tel Aviv has threatened to launch air strikes against Iranian nuclear installations under the pretext that Tehran, a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), has plans to develop nuclear weaponry.
This is while, in its latest report on Iran, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced that it could not find any 'components of a nuclear weapon' or 'related nuclear physics studies' in the country.
In response to war threats, Iran has warned that it would not hesitate to target 'Israel and 32 US bases' in the region, should the country come under attack.
An Israeli official accompanying Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on a visit to Moscow, however, declined to comment on the Channel 10 report. According to a senior Israeli official, Olmert is in Russia to persuade the country into not selling S-300 missile defense system to Iran.
Late in September, The Guardian quoted EU diplomatic sources as saying that US president George W. Bush in a one to one meeting with Israeli Premier Ehud Olmert on May 14 rejected the idea of an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Bush not only ruled out the idea but insisted that his view would not change, according to The Guardian.
The Monday report comes as several Israeli military and Mossad officials, in an unexpected move on Sunday, endorsed the Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Democrat Barack Obama has vowed direct talks with Iranian leaders over its nuclear activities. The Arizona Senator has also declared that he would remove US combat troops within 16 months of taking office in January, 2009.
However, Republican John McCain, a staunch supporter of the Iraq war, has refused to provide a timetable and has said that troops could remain in Iraq for 'a hundred years.'
Former Gaza Sector Commander, Brig.-Gen. Shaul Arieli said, "Obama is the right man for the job [of stopping Iran]."
The former Mossad agent, Alpher, said Republican candidate John McCain would continue the failed policies of the current US President.
"Four more years of indecisiveness would harm Israel," added former chief of the Army Central Command, Amram Mitzna."
...
I don't know if there's really going to be an election, but I'm afraid that if Obama wins, he'll be the new Manchurian candidate. Here's something from WND:
"Kenya – The government of Kenya is holding WND senior staff reporter Jerome Corsi incommunicado at the airport until he departs the country after police shut down a scheduled news conference in which he planned to announce the findings of his investigation into Barack Obama's connections in the country."
...
Obama-youth? Arrested for 'telling lies' about Obama?
Blackshirts, anyone?
sunnuntai 5. lokakuuta 2008
China rules
Say what?! I knew it.
You got heads of the fractional reserve system backing up foreign debt with more debt while placing value on assets the are basically worthless. You got head of treasury with connections to Goldman Sachs running the show with total immunity giving the speculators, who really launched the whole situation, a blank cheque. That's insanity!
I'm speechless.
torstai 2. lokakuuta 2008
The coming Amero
Yeah, it's a conspiracy theory, doesn't exist. Canada doesn't exist. Mexico doesn't exist. SPP doesn't exist. I mean, come on!
Hal Turner reports that: "The US Secretary of the Treasury has informed the China Development Bank that the US has shipped $800 Billion of a new currency called the Amero, which is to be based upon the merging of the economies of The United States, Mexico and Canada into what is termed as The North American Union."
The rest of the article can be found here. Please, wake up.
Hal Turner reports that: "The US Secretary of the Treasury has informed the China Development Bank that the US has shipped $800 Billion of a new currency called the Amero, which is to be based upon the merging of the economies of The United States, Mexico and Canada into what is termed as The North American Union."
The rest of the article can be found here. Please, wake up.
Investigate
Please do your own research, before it's too late. Here's the ultimate goal.
...
And then there's this: "The former Finnish president Martti Ahtisaari is to receive the Felix Houphouët-Boigny peace prize at Unescto headquarters in Paris on Thursday.
Henry Kissinger, a former US secretary of state and winner of the Nobel peace price, said in May that Mr Ahtisaari had been chosen "for his lifetime contribution to world peace".
After a number of peace missions in Africa, Mr Ahtisaari supervised the disarmament of the Irish Republican Army and acted as mediator between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement and between Sunnis and Shias in Iraq.
Previous laureates of the Houphouët-Boigny prize include Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter, Nelson Mandela, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...
Tilaa:
Blogitekstit (Atom)
